the Postal Newsgroup
The fourth of the phases within the sequence of collapse we have been discussing is the era of breakdown. With the potential menace of a shutdown of the federal government looming large once once more, largely because of the struggle over Obamacare, you would possibly wish to know how it will personally affect you. It talks about job creation, speicifically a vote on brining jobs home, and the conservative hypocrisy in killing the bill. If we go to the intense of having little or no government intervention, like no tax (estate, earnings, and so on.), the wealthy would hold getting richer. The federal government must characterize the complete constituency, which will definitely not be the case if the rich own our political processes.
The federal government in America previous to the Great Depression had no downside letting its residents wither on the vine; conservative thinking is that it isn't the governments job to help the Individuals. I would like to especially emphasize the last paragraph in your latest remark: Many Africans still starve or are near starving and this IS due in large part to broken political methods, but that doesn't present any proof towards a fair capitalism. Due to human flaws, with out authorities intervention, what assert becomes a mathematical certainty.
The federal authorities was created to be a central government for limited puposes and to not turn into the states. It's not the job of the federal authorities to play Robin Hood with someone elese wealth. The federal authorities wants to cut back its size and scope and return the powers that belong to the states again Latest Bank Jobs to them. The items needed by the poor are usually not taxed, and the federal government would get their cash immediately. The army-industrial advanced has at all times profited from the actions of the US government.
The role of the government should be to work without bias for the happiness of all of the folks, and that won't happen if a bit of the inhabitants has higher affect. The federal government being clear would assist the issue, but over time I feel money will cloud the transparency again. However even if we assume that the democratic authorities is functioning as it ought to, pretty and (most importantly) transparently, there may be still an issue if there isn't any non-public property.
It was solely when the federal government started caring did: slavery end; people started getting paid a wage with which they may be capable to afford a roof and a tiny little bit of meals; cleaned up the environment to a outstanding diploma; put a clamp on major recessions, until 2008 of course after America reverted back to WBA's philosophy of the 1800s.